Don’t like Neil Young’s oilsands activism? Somebody had to get the discussion going!

By Janet Keeping, leader, Green Party of Alberta

One of the greatest harms caused by the ever-expanding oil sands projects is the way denial of the problems caused by them is undermining democracy in Alberta.  The view of too many in government and industry has been that the oilsands must be shielded from pretty much any and all criticism because they are essential – and with every expansion ever more essential – to our economy.  As a result critics are aggressively attacked as “emotional” or “traitors” – anything to shut them up.  All criticism has been off limits.

It doesn’t seem to matter that there are even Cabinet ministers who doubt the wisdom of allowing the oilsands to dominate our public policy and economy in the way they do.  In a speech delivered in November in Prince Edward Island while he was deputy premier, Doug Griffiths lamented the imbalance caused by the energy sector:  he has been quoted as saying that, “Everyone thinks it’s a benefit and a bonus because we have such a dominant commodity, but you know it sucks the life out of every other aspect of Alberta.”

Nor has it mattered that by largely ignoring the severity of the environmental and Aboriginal issues, government and industry have been endangering the social license of the industry to operate.  Much of the rest of the world has seen through the blustering, spin and denial by Alberta’s government and the oilsands industry.  Ironically, support for the oilsands is weaker because criticism has been muzzled.

And then along comes “Heart of Gold” Canadian icon Neil Young who blows the doors off the enforced silence.  People who have avoided talking about the oilsands like the plague are forced to say something.  Is it just possible that a public discussion has been launched?  I sure hope so.

Don’t get me wrong.  I too wish that Young had had all his facts straight.  For example, oilsands production does not go primarily to China as Young  said.  Overwhelmingly it goes to US markets.  But that isn’t the crux of the matter.  The important thing is that by provoking more discussion about the oilsands than we have ever before had in a comparable length of time, he has put his celebrity to good public use.

True, the discussion so provoked has been pretty low quality with irrelevancies tossed around with gay abandon.  I mean, seriously, of course Neil Young has to take planes to do the kind of work that he does.  That should not be held against him, nor should that fact be taken as undermining what he has to say.

If we progress to a better, more inclusive and sustained discussion of the oilsands, then we’ll have the opportunity to consider something other than the polarized, false dichotomy of “all or nothing” that is usually forced upon us.  Although if we could start all over again, I think most Albertans wouldn’t let development of the oilsands run amuck the way it has.  But we are in way too deep economically to turn off the oilsands taps tomorrow, even if that’s what a solid majority of us wanted to do.

Something more cautious is needed, something more like this:  we should be stepping production down gradually, but decisively, until we reach a sustainable level, one that won’t do irreversible damage to individuals, communities, the climate and the natural environment.  Reaching sustainability should be the focus of male enhancement the conversation Albertans so badly need to have.

For my earlier blog on reducing the level of production to a more sustainable level see

Comments 4

  • What makes me want to bang my head against the wall is that the tarsands defenders always counter criticism by claiming the critics are poorly informed etc. but then those very same spin doctors muzzle, ignore, downplay and cut funding to the scientists who give
    expert and unbiased opinions.

  • Janet, I like your ideas and support the advancement of a Green agenda. It just seems to me like now is the time to use the momentum of the PC collapse to do as Naheed Nenshi implied and form a coalition to hold Wild Rose in check. Do we really want another right wing dynasty? We may not be able to stop them from forming the next government but unless we work together to form an effective opposition, well, I know I don’t need to tell you what will happen. Someone has to make the first move. Call a press conference and invite the other parties to a strategy session where everyone brings their best ideas forward and run on them together. Think of what Jack Layton got Dion and Duceppe to agree on to stop Harper until he prorogued and beat them. Once a coalition can be formed to go to the polls on. I believe we can attract a strong voice to act as leader, perhaps Nenshi himself. The future of us all is at stake and I sincerely hope you see the merits of this and get the ball rolling.

    • You are quite right, Janet, that the progressive alternative parties should work together to achieve the best possible results after the next election. I am not sure about a coalition as many people mistrust the idea of “coalition”. I don’t but many people do. But at a minimum, we need to work cooperatively, for example, the progressive parties (Greens, NDs and Liberals, not sure that the Alberta Party stands for anything at all) should not run strong candidates against each other. If a riding is already held by a progressive party, the others should not run against him or her. So there is much we can do to maximize the good that can come out of the next election.
      And there is plenty more to be talked about, so thank you for the encouragement to think and act strategically. And please save the date Saturday, April 12, 2:30 – 4:00 pm, to be held at the Alexandra Centre, 9 Ave SE, in Inglewood. We are holding an event with Elizabeth May to discuss “Doing Politics Differently.” Your thoughts on how Greens can work most effectively for sustainable change in the province would be most welcome at this event. Please come.